수종의 구강환경검사 결과와 현존 구강상태와의 상관관계에 관한 임상적 연구
A CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DIAGNOSTIC POWER BETWEEN SOME ORAL ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS AND ORAL STATUS OF INDIVIDUALS
조웅휘, 강용희,
소속 상세정보
조웅휘 ( ) - 단국대학교 치과대학 예방치과학교실
강용희 ( ) - 단국대학교 치과대학 예방치과학교실
KMID : 0355419900140020243
Abstract
The purpose of this study were intended to find out the best testing method for oral environmental tests performing the preventive dental care programme effectively. In this study, 70 volunteers in the third decade experimented such as Cariostat examination. Cariescreen SM examination, oral microflora examination by using phase contrast microscopy and dental plaque index examination and compared to individual DFT rate, simplified oral hygiene index and clinical periodontal status by visual examinations. After performing each tests, the author evaluated the data in view of three factors, such as sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic power and compared to total diagnostic power of each testing methods. The results were as followings:
1. On caries prevalence testing methods, the total diagnostic power resulted from oral micro-flora examination by using phase contrast microscopy was the highest as 67.61%hand similar results derived from the data in cariostat as 66.66%, simplified oral hygiene index as 66.66% and cariescreen SM as 66.19%, and plaque index represented some lower result as 6-3.33%.
2. On oral hygiene status testing methods, the total diagnostic power in oral microflora examination by using plase contrast microscopy was appared more higher as 81.42% and that of the result from the dental plaque index examination as 77.61%.
3. On periodontal status testing methods, the total diagnostic power was appeared as 88.10% in oral microflora examination by using phase contrast microscopy and 75.24% in simplified oral hygiene index examination and 60.00% in dental plaque index examination.
4. Oral microflora examination by using phase contrast microscopy was recommended for preventive dental care programme clinically because of it´s high predictable level in total diagnostic power compared to other testing methods.
키워드
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보